Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46731 - 46740 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 46731 - 46740 of 84312 for case number.
Frontsheet
2011 WI 32 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP956-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64285 - 2011-05-16
2011 WI 32 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP956-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64285 - 2011-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
maker and, therefore, the Roberts deposition “destroyed the bank’s prima facie case” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86571 - 2012-08-29
maker and, therefore, the Roberts deposition “destroyed the bank’s prima facie case” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86571 - 2012-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Sam Elam
; and this case does not merit reversal under § 752.35 because the real controversy was tried, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14854 - 2017-09-21
; and this case does not merit reversal under § 752.35 because the real controversy was tried, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14854 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Fred Carlson v. Trailer Equipment and Supply, Inc.
agreement that no additional discovery was needed, the case was ripe for summary judgment. Third, res
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14496 - 2017-09-21
agreement that no additional discovery was needed, the case was ripe for summary judgment. Third, res
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14496 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to trial due to the complexity of the case and to an interruption in their trial preparation when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119547 - 2014-09-15
to trial due to the complexity of the case and to an interruption in their trial preparation when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119547 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Josephine Artac v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
2000 WI App 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15626 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the precise facts presented in a given case. See id., ¶21. Rather, great weight deference is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170273 - 2017-09-21
the precise facts presented in a given case. See id., ¶21. Rather, great weight deference is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the evidence was insufficient to support the continuing CHIPS grounds in his son’s case; and, (5) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212323 - 2018-05-08
) the evidence was insufficient to support the continuing CHIPS grounds in his son’s case; and, (5) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212323 - 2018-05-08
Certification
this standard fit in with the time limits for a motion to withdraw the plea? BACKGROUND In three separate cases
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133320 - 2015-01-20
this standard fit in with the time limits for a motion to withdraw the plea? BACKGROUND In three separate cases
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133320 - 2015-01-20
Scott Alan Ludtke v. Department of Corrections
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1745
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10982 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1745
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10982 - 2005-03-31