Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46741 - 46750 of 68485 for did.
Search results 46741 - 46750 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Rodriguez
. A. Probable Cause. ¶11 The trial court in this case did not find that probable cause to search the house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3047 - 2017-09-19
. A. Probable Cause. ¶11 The trial court in this case did not find that probable cause to search the house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3047 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Denettria J.
its belief that another psychologist would be duplicative. The trial court did, however, permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20860 - 2017-09-21
its belief that another psychologist would be duplicative. The trial court did, however, permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20860 - 2017-09-21
State v. David K. Dellis
and Kenneth Schmail to examine him. Both reported that they did not believe Dellis lacked substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14750 - 2005-03-31
and Kenneth Schmail to examine him. Both reported that they did not believe Dellis lacked substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14750 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Wozniak
that it did not “find anything about [trial counsel’s] conduct … to be substandard.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11773 - 2005-03-31
that it did not “find anything about [trial counsel’s] conduct … to be substandard.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark W. Roob
, claiming that the check was nonrefundable. Because the wedding was only three months away and they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4665 - 2017-09-19
, claiming that the check was nonrefundable. Because the wedding was only three months away and they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4665 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Bouraxis via Bouraxis Investments, a sole proprietorship through which Bouraxis did business, making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214488 - 2018-06-19
to Bouraxis via Bouraxis Investments, a sole proprietorship through which Bouraxis did business, making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214488 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
criminal under § 939.62, the rationale of this case does not apply. Moreover, the holding in Wimmer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15123 - 2017-09-21
criminal under § 939.62, the rationale of this case does not apply. Moreover, the holding in Wimmer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
him for obstructing an officer. At trial, Suriano asserted he did not rush up to Moe, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163351 - 2017-09-21
him for obstructing an officer. At trial, Suriano asserted he did not rush up to Moe, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was later identified as the front- seat passenger of the Chevy Malibu, did not roll down his window
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107212 - 2017-09-21
was later identified as the front- seat passenger of the Chevy Malibu, did not roll down his window
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107212 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 40
of the trial court, but did so on a ground that was fact-specific to this case: at the time of their divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259253 - 2020-07-09
of the trial court, but did so on a ground that was fact-specific to this case: at the time of their divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259253 - 2020-07-09