Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46751 - 46760 of 74828 for public records.
Search results 46751 - 46760 of 74828 for public records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon consideration of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109567 - 2026-04-29
not responded. Upon consideration of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109567 - 2026-04-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon consideration of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109567 - 2026-04-29
not responded. Upon consideration of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109567 - 2026-04-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
Douglas Thums v. Village of Rib Lake
disagree. Because § 74.11(12)(a) does not require treasurers to search all available records to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26392 - 2017-09-21
disagree. Because § 74.11(12)(a) does not require treasurers to search all available records to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26392 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ronald A. Arthur v. Randy Keefe
with Doyle’s case is without support in the record. There is no record of Arthur petitioning the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14214 - 2014-09-15
with Doyle’s case is without support in the record. There is no record of Arthur petitioning the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14214 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brady B.
with regard to charging the female juvenile. Such a record was not made. Second, the State has not really
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14191 - 2014-09-15
with regard to charging the female juvenile. Such a record was not made. Second, the State has not really
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14191 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
being charged – they come after me with the past record. THE COURT: You have no past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
being charged – they come after me with the past record. THE COURT: You have no past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision on certiorari review. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170190 - 2017-09-21
decision on certiorari review. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170190 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or resentencing. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262670 - 2020-06-02
or resentencing. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262670 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212718 - 2018-05-15
of the report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212718 - 2018-05-15