Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4681 - 4690 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4681 - 4690 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Deryl B. Beyer
, Reserve Judge, denying Deryl B. Beyer's pro se motion for release from commitment as a sexually violent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20877 - 2017-09-21
, Reserve Judge, denying Deryl B. Beyer's pro se motion for release from commitment as a sexually violent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
confinement "for all days spent in custody in connection with the course of conduct for which sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668466 - 2023-06-14
confinement "for all days spent in custody in connection with the course of conduct for which sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668466 - 2023-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). She was temporarily placed in nonsecure custody in her mother’s home on March 15, 2023. A few weeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925477 - 2025-03-12
). She was temporarily placed in nonsecure custody in her mother’s home on March 15, 2023. A few weeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925477 - 2025-03-12
State v. Roosevelt Bennett
postconviction motion to vacate the commitment order. Bennett claims that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion to vacate the commitment order. Bennett claims that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
-incrimination?5 ¶7 The court of appeals concluded that the circuit court properly denied the motions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98272 - 2017-09-21
-incrimination?5 ¶7 The court of appeals concluded that the circuit court properly denied the motions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98272 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
court properly denied the motions to suppress: "[T]he evidence that Sahs relies upon [namely
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98272 - 2013-08-13
court properly denied the motions to suppress: "[T]he evidence that Sahs relies upon [namely
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98272 - 2013-08-13
[PDF]
Shirley Kroening v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin
of custodial care. The trial court granted the motion and Blue Cross does not appeal that issue. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14566 - 2017-09-21
of custodial care. The trial court granted the motion and Blue Cross does not appeal that issue. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14566 - 2017-09-21
Shirley Kroening v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin
the amendment, which added the definition of custodial care. The trial court granted the motion and Blue Cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14566 - 2010-06-30
the amendment, which added the definition of custodial care. The trial court granted the motion and Blue Cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14566 - 2010-06-30
Peters & Vanden Heuvel v. Richard Vanden Heuvel
Heuvel appeals from an order denying his motion for relief from judgment.[1] Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
Heuvel appeals from an order denying his motion for relief from judgment.[1] Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peters & Vanden Heuvel v. Richard Vanden Heuvel
denying his motion for relief from judgment.1 Because we conclude that Vanden Heuvel is judicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14575 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for relief from judgment.1 Because we conclude that Vanden Heuvel is judicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14575 - 2017-09-21