Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46801 - 46810 of 74506 for ha.

State v. Robert Junior Carr
, the defendant has the burden to “show some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18142 - 2005-05-16

COURT OF APPEALS
construction or use has been changed. However, the State asserts, the trooper’s observation provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34521 - 2008-11-05

[PDF] Thomas Moullette v. City of Rice Lake
or failure to give the requisite notice has not been prejudicial to the defendant fire company, corporation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4915 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
has a viable safe-place claim based on Western Lanes’ failure to properly repair or maintain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500685 - 2022-03-29

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew O. Olaiya
; failing to return an advance payment of a fee that has not been earned; failing to act with reasonable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16454 - 2017-09-21

State v. James A. H.
delinquent if he or she has violated a condition of a dispositional order. Therefore, because James violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4070 - 2005-03-31

State v. Earl L. Diehl
676, 678 (Ct. App. 1994). We will reverse a trial court's decision only if the court has erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9625 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id. at 694. Because the defendant has the burden of showing both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57316 - 2010-12-01

[PDF] Wauwatosa School District v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
of law.” “[W]hether an insurer has a duty to defend is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12963 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kevin E. Lins v. James Blau
to the satisfaction of the court that the delay or failure to give the requisite notice has not been prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12960 - 2017-09-21