Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46841 - 46850 of 57915 for a i x.
Search results 46841 - 46850 of 57915 for a i x.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
oral argument in response to the DOC’s motion and instead simply “rel[ied] on the Court’s earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
oral argument in response to the DOC’s motion and instead simply “rel[ied] on the Court’s earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Patrick Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Patrick Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20
City of Madison v. William J. Sanders
the prosecutor told the jury, "I do believe that you will find Ms. Knight's testimony as more credible." When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2005-03-31
the prosecutor told the jury, "I do believe that you will find Ms. Knight's testimony as more credible." When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT I April 30, 2024 To: Hon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792639 - 2024-04-30
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT I April 30, 2024 To: Hon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792639 - 2024-04-30
[PDF]
State v. Antroy T. McGee
. No. 2000CF558 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26534 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2000CF558 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26534 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lue Her
that motions to withdraw are sometimes brought for the purpose of delay “and I’m not indicating that, but I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7611 - 2005-03-31
that motions to withdraw are sometimes brought for the purpose of delay “and I’m not indicating that, but I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7611 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brenda K. Roberts
that the arrest was for a first offense OWI, and that he wrote in his incident report that “[i]t should be noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15121 - 2005-03-31
that the arrest was for a first offense OWI, and that he wrote in his incident report that “[i]t should be noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15121 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mary F.-R.
Reports. No. 95-2608-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
Reports. No. 95-2608-FT STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
State v. Argyle L. Hagen
. Const. art. I, § 11. A police officer has probable cause to arrest when the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
. Const. art. I, § 11. A police officer has probable cause to arrest when the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brent R. Reed
to ask whether he read the entire transcript. Deputy Otto confirmed that he had, stating “I thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16
to ask whether he read the entire transcript. Deputy Otto confirmed that he had, stating “I thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16