Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46851 - 46860 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 46851 - 46860 of 83395 for simple case search.
State v. Larry D. Hicks
of this case, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 On November 9, 2003, Hicks pried open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
of this case, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 On November 9, 2003, Hicks pried open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
State v. Larry Anderson
cases. At a hearing on Anderson’s motion, the State agreed that buy money may not be ordered reimbursed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
cases. At a hearing on Anderson’s motion, the State agreed that buy money may not be ordered reimbursed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181038 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181038 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107294 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fully tried is appropriate only in exceptional cases. State v. Doss, 2008 WI 93, ¶86, 312 Wis. 2d 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90570 - 2014-09-15
fully tried is appropriate only in exceptional cases. State v. Doss, 2008 WI 93, ¶86, 312 Wis. 2d 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90570 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Bender
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1095-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12356 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1095-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12356 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906873 - 2025-01-28
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906873 - 2025-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case in chief, Huml moved for a directed verdict. Huml argued his agreement with Krisik
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35285 - 2009-01-20
of the State’s case in chief, Huml moved for a directed verdict. Huml argued his agreement with Krisik
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35285 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
felony cases, with the condition that he not commit any crime.2 For his actions, the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247675 - 2019-10-02
felony cases, with the condition that he not commit any crime.2 For his actions, the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247675 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because the defendant in that case was being sentenced under the truth-in-sentencing scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90116 - 2014-09-15
because the defendant in that case was being sentenced under the truth-in-sentencing scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90116 - 2014-09-15