Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46881 - 46890 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46881 - 46890 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
2002 WI App 309 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4989 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 309 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4989 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to as the “1977 Fence.” Another landmark relevant to this case is a monument, referred to as the Harrison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134443 - 2017-09-21
to as the “1977 Fence.” Another landmark relevant to this case is a monument, referred to as the Harrison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 71
of a specific case are not part of the verbatim record of the case. (5) The director of state courts shall
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248899 - 2019-10-17
of a specific case are not part of the verbatim record of the case. (5) The director of state courts shall
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248899 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of coercion may be raised as a defense to the citations in this case. However, I agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228737 - 2018-11-29
of coercion may be raised as a defense to the citations in this case. However, I agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228737 - 2018-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss, but read in, the three other charges in the case. The circuit court conducted a standard plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104673 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss, but read in, the three other charges in the case. The circuit court conducted a standard plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297752 - 2020-10-20
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297752 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
“must individualize the sentence to the defendant based on the facts of the case by identifying the most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22
“must individualize the sentence to the defendant based on the facts of the case by identifying the most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
(1999), because he did not show that the evidence was consequential to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33191 - 2008-06-30
(1999), because he did not show that the evidence was consequential to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33191 - 2008-06-30