Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46891 - 46900 of 69007 for had.

Judith Kay Briggs v. Donald James Briggs
they were both thirty-one years old. Judith, who had a high school diploma, worked in a factory earning $4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6150 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] McAdams, Inc. v. Transportation Insurance Co.
in bankruptcy. McAdams had commercial crime coverage with TIC and prepared a claim. When the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11710 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and started banging on the front door. Edwards told S.G. that he had been watching her and knew she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270840 - 2020-07-21

State v. Kareem Q. Curry
deal of pain from injuries he had suffered. The trial court rejected that testimony and held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6742 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
who had not attained the age of 13 years, contrary to Wisconsin Statutes Section 948.02(1). (Bolding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30672 - 2007-10-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
trial, the State moved to admit other-acts evidence of a complex series of lies that Halderson had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042665 - 2025-11-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the child to a detective. At the time of this incident, Perkins had not been adjudicated the legal father
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258475 - 2020-04-28

[PDF] State v. Luster Goodman, Jr.
around to Johnson.” The fight between Wesley and Johnson was over cocaine that Wesley had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10553 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
, this court concluded that Eckendorf had not demonstrated that the Austins unreasonably burdened her estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4418 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
As we have explained, counsel had no basis to challenge jurisdiction based on Dotel’s bindover. Dotel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2006-12-13