Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Herschel Knighton
appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and from the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4910 - 2017-09-19
appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and from the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4910 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). She was temporarily placed in nonsecure custody in her mother’s home on March 15, 2023. A few weeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925477 - 2025-03-12
). She was temporarily placed in nonsecure custody in her mother’s home on March 15, 2023. A few weeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925477 - 2025-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
] Ginevra joined in Mary’s objection. Robert filed a motion asking that the objection be stricken. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50332 - 2010-05-25
] Ginevra joined in Mary’s objection. Robert filed a motion asking that the objection be stricken. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50332 - 2010-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the City of Cedarburg’s motion for summary judgment. The City asserted governmental immunity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339622 - 2021-02-24
the City of Cedarburg’s motion for summary judgment. The City asserted governmental immunity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339622 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
Mary Klauser v. Robert Schmitz
appointment, claiming that she was improperly excluding the joint accounts as well as other assets from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5955 - 2017-09-19
appointment, claiming that she was improperly excluding the joint accounts as well as other assets from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5955 - 2017-09-19
Mary Klauser v. Robert Schmitz
—objected to Klauser’s appointment, claiming that she was improperly excluding the joint accounts as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
—objected to Klauser’s appointment, claiming that she was improperly excluding the joint accounts as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 856.23(1)(e) to be named PR.1 Ginevra joined in Mary’s objection. Robert filed a motion asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50332 - 2014-09-15
. § 856.23(1)(e) to be named PR.1 Ginevra joined in Mary’s objection. Robert filed a motion asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50332 - 2014-09-15
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
, Stats., 1993-94; and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We address the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
, Stats., 1993-94; and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We address the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
) and 161.48, STATS., 1993-94; and an order denying his No. 97-0974-CR 2 motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
) and 161.48, STATS., 1993-94; and an order denying his No. 97-0974-CR 2 motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Union No. 30 involved whether a joint union-employer committee formed to resolve labor disputes owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
Union No. 30 involved whether a joint union-employer committee formed to resolve labor disputes owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14