Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 17273 for Search wicourts.gov.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 17273 for Search wicourts.gov.
State v. Lance R. Ward
that evidence derived from a search of his residence should have been suppressed. Ward contends that the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
that evidence derived from a search of his residence should have been suppressed. Ward contends that the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 84
Arias's motion to suppress the weapon and the drugs obtained pursuant to the search conducted following
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33358 - 2014-09-15
Arias's motion to suppress the weapon and the drugs obtained pursuant to the search conducted following
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33358 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
motion to suppress the weapon and the drugs obtained pursuant to the search conducted following a police
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33358 - 2008-07-08
motion to suppress the weapon and the drugs obtained pursuant to the search conducted following a police
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33358 - 2008-07-08
Frontsheet
unreasonable searches under both the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117932 - 2015-01-20
unreasonable searches under both the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117932 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
violated his right against unreasonable searches under both the Fourth Amendment of the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117932 - 2015-02-18
violated his right against unreasonable searches under both the Fourth Amendment of the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117932 - 2015-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress, in which he argued that the warrantless search of his vehicle was unlawful. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116672 - 2014-07-15
to suppress, in which he argued that the warrantless search of his vehicle was unlawful. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116672 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
search of Sloan’s No. 2008AP1046-CR 2 bathroom was constitutionally reasonable. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39275 - 2014-09-15
search of Sloan’s No. 2008AP1046-CR 2 bathroom was constitutionally reasonable. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39275 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in which he argued that the warrantless search of his vehicle was unlawful. We affirm. ¶2 Testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116672 - 2017-09-21
, in which he argued that the warrantless search of his vehicle was unlawful. We affirm. ¶2 Testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116672 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a warrantless search of the 1 Brown does not raise any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95174 - 2014-09-15
a warrantless search of the 1 Brown does not raise any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95174 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff’s warrantless search of Sloan’s bathroom was constitutionally reasonable. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39275 - 2009-08-10
sheriff’s warrantless search of Sloan’s bathroom was constitutionally reasonable. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39275 - 2009-08-10