Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 82596 for case codes/1000.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 82596 for case codes/1000.
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
then sought review by the CCE. The complaint was again rejected as untimely under Wis. Admin. Code § DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
then sought review by the CCE. The complaint was again rejected as untimely under Wis. Admin. Code § DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
. The complaint was again rejected as untimely under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 310.09(6). The CCE further stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19
. The complaint was again rejected as untimely under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 310.09(6). The CCE further stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John E. Stephens
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9457 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9457 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the burden of proof set forth in WIS. ADMIN. CODE § Ins 5.39(3), which requires OCI to prove the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107537 - 2017-09-21
the burden of proof set forth in WIS. ADMIN. CODE § Ins 5.39(3), which requires OCI to prove the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107537 - 2017-09-21
State v. John E. Stephens
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in their testimony in this case, and the Dermodys were not.” ¶13 Michael cites no authority in support of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107537 - 2014-01-29
in their testimony in this case, and the Dermodys were not.” ¶13 Michael cites no authority in support of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107537 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the zoning code as previously ordered by the circuit court. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06
with the zoning code as previously ordered by the circuit court. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
of them, John Schott, testified at the suppression hearing was to check the tavern’s licenses and for code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34701 - 2008-11-24
of them, John Schott, testified at the suppression hearing was to check the tavern’s licenses and for code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34701 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
and for code violations. The circuit court found that ten to fifteen officers were part of the “license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34701 - 2014-09-15
and for code violations. The circuit court found that ten to fifteen officers were part of the “license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34701 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191683 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191683 - 2017-09-21