Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 17024 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 17024 for search wicourts.gov.
State v. Scott K. Schaefer
and told him that he would be conducting a “pat-down” search. Schaefer raised his arms out to his sides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31
and told him that he would be conducting a “pat-down” search. Schaefer raised his arms out to his sides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lamont Caldwell
illegal entry and search. We conclude that trial counsel waived his objection to admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7688 - 2017-09-19
illegal entry and search. We conclude that trial counsel waived his objection to admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7688 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
State v. Lamont Caldwell
following an allegedly illegal entry and search. We conclude that trial counsel waived his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7688 - 2005-03-31
following an allegedly illegal entry and search. We conclude that trial counsel waived his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Thomas Erickson
request, a sheriff’s deputy applied for a search warrant to search Erickson’s home for photo albums
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12821 - 2017-09-21
request, a sheriff’s deputy applied for a search warrant to search Erickson’s home for photo albums
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott K. Schaefer
and told him that he would be conducting a “pat- down” search. Schaefer raised his arms out to his sides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9840 - 2017-09-19
and told him that he would be conducting a “pat- down” search. Schaefer raised his arms out to his sides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9840 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Hovick
a marijuana plant. A subsequent search under warrant discovered additional drug paraphernalia in what turned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9555 - 2005-03-31
a marijuana plant. A subsequent search under warrant discovered additional drug paraphernalia in what turned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his car for traffic violations. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72333 - 2014-09-15
they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his car for traffic violations. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72333 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
violated the Fourth Amendment when they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17
violated the Fourth Amendment when they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17