Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 4691 - 4700 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
to search. Ibid. ¶6 Unlike the situation in Luebeck, the police in this case had not yet completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
to search. Ibid. ¶6 Unlike the situation in Luebeck, the police in this case had not yet completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State v. Stevens
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
[PDF]
State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
; and (2) if the latter, was there probable cause to arrest in this case. We conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15078 - 2017-09-21
; and (2) if the latter, was there probable cause to arrest in this case. We conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15078 - 2017-09-21
State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul H. Gates
is whether the police had grounds to stop Gates and search his vehicle (where the marijuana was found). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
is whether the police had grounds to stop Gates and search his vehicle (where the marijuana was found). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul H. Gates
for the search of adjacent property. We think it is an appropriate question on the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9826 - 2017-09-19
for the search of adjacent property. We think it is an appropriate question on the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9826 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=09/06/2023&end_date=09/06/2023
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=09/06/2023&end_date=09/06/2023