Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46901 - 46910 of 69007 for had.
Search results 46901 - 46910 of 69007 for had.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
above. It also concluded that DOC had just cause within the meaning of WIS. No. 2024AP531 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934447 - 2025-04-02
above. It also concluded that DOC had just cause within the meaning of WIS. No. 2024AP531 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934447 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he had no real choice in the matter. The officers testified that they did not threaten to arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120414 - 2014-09-15
that he had no real choice in the matter. The officers testified that they did not threaten to arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
colloquy. We explained, however, that counsel had not addressed whether there would be arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
colloquy. We explained, however, that counsel had not addressed whether there would be arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
On appeal, this court concluded that Eckendorf had not demonstrated that the Austins unreasonably burdened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4418 - 2005-03-31
On appeal, this court concluded that Eckendorf had not demonstrated that the Austins unreasonably burdened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4418 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he had been convicted of nonexistent crimes. By order dated January 9, 2007, we denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
that he had been convicted of nonexistent crimes. By order dated January 9, 2007, we denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
three vacation breaks, and he did not testify that he had ever asked or been refused permission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172065 - 2017-09-21
three vacation breaks, and he did not testify that he had ever asked or been refused permission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172065 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
must affirmatively prove that the alleged defect in counsel’s performance actually had an adverse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98007 - 2013-06-11
must affirmatively prove that the alleged defect in counsel’s performance actually had an adverse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98007 - 2013-06-11
CA Blank Order
being nullified.” However, Crenshaw does not claim that he would have testified had he known that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93740 - 2013-03-03
being nullified.” However, Crenshaw does not claim that he would have testified had he known that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93740 - 2013-03-03
[PDF]
Dennis G. Ohlson v. Adams County Board of Adjustment
lots on Lake Sherwood in Adams County. When Ohlson purchased the property in 1981, it had a house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11655 - 2017-09-19
lots on Lake Sherwood in Adams County. When Ohlson purchased the property in 1981, it had a house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11655 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion on the ground that he had not shown a sufficient likelihood that the medical records would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454286 - 2021-11-23
motion on the ground that he had not shown a sufficient likelihood that the medical records would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454286 - 2021-11-23