Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46911 - 46920 of 55745 for n y c.

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(b); 340.01(46m)(c). If the State charges a defendant with operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86833 - 2012-09-10

State v. Timothy J. Lee
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tara S.
that the test for termination “requires the [c]ourt to consider all the circumstances,” and that, “for obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5931 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. §§ 943.34(1)(c), No. 2006AP2733-CR 2 939.05 (2003-04).1 Tolefree claims that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29959 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2005-06). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30941 - 2014-09-15

James B. Clark v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
, interpreted the x-ray noting “[c]hronic wedge deformity of mid thoracic.” The emergency room physician
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17610 - 2005-04-12

COURT OF APPEALS
of the following: The defendant contends that the [c]ourt did not conform to the Bangert plea requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108175 - 2014-02-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
factor that the court determines is relevant.” Sec. 767.59(1f)(c)4. ¶10 Given the catch-all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399761 - 2021-07-27

[PDF] NOTICE
or willful manner, and its prosecutive merit. (c) The adequacy and suitability of facilities, services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28032 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
Court Street, Room 203 Sparta, WI 54656-1765 Andrew C. Kaftan Corporation Counsel 112 S. Court St. #103
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09