Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46921 - 46930 of 59340 for SMALL CLAIMS.

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Elaine H.
in foster placements pursuant to the CHIPS orders, Elaine had moved to Chicago, where she claimed to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kathleen J. Anderson v. Burnett County
and direct that judgment be entered upon the jury verdict. Kathleen and Larry Anderson filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10635 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
cannot prevail on this claim. See Hoppe, 261 Wis. 2d 294, ¶37. ¶27 Finally, we turn to Carlson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577069 - 2022-10-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
here is whether the State’s sovereign immunity prevents the merits of WSEU’s claim from being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93422 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Scott Development Company, L.L.C. v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
testified that the remaining property’s value was reduced after the taking. Scott claims, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15949 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
the prosecution was commenced. ¶5 In October 2000, Haines moved for dismissal, claiming that the prosecution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16508 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a claim of defective notice because he was represented by counsel when he elected to forego the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34830 - 2008-12-09

Labor Ready, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
for that day. ¶4 Powell filed for worker’s compensation. Labor Ready denied the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18634 - 2005-07-26

COURT OF APPEALS
or special proceedings shall be as follows: (a) In the county where the claim arose; (b) In the county where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42805 - 2009-10-28

[PDF] William O. Chaudoir v. City of Sturgeon Bay
challenging the City's special No. 99-0055-FT 6 assessment. The City claims that waiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14967 - 2017-09-21