Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46941 - 46950 of 58900 for do.
Search results 46941 - 46950 of 58900 for do.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement that we retain confidence in the outcome of the no-merit proceeding that we do not share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
statement that we retain confidence in the outcome of the no-merit proceeding that we do not share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
at the conclusion of the hearing on June 6, 2000, when she first appeared with her attorney. We do not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
at the conclusion of the hearing on June 6, 2000, when she first appeared with her attorney. We do not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the diagnosis of Stanley’s degenerative brain disorder was improperly overlooked by the court. We do not affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40493 - 2009-09-08
that the diagnosis of Stanley’s degenerative brain disorder was improperly overlooked by the court. We do not affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40493 - 2009-09-08
State v. Timothy Roy Miner
. The record reflects that the trial court clearly understood Miner's argument: I do not agree with your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11218 - 2005-03-31
. The record reflects that the trial court clearly understood Miner's argument: I do not agree with your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11218 - 2005-03-31
State v. David G. Huusko
are not necessarily due to the passage of time and do not, by themselves, constitute proof of prejudice due to delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26441 - 2006-09-11
are not necessarily due to the passage of time and do not, by themselves, constitute proof of prejudice due to delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26441 - 2006-09-11
State v. Brent R. Reed
to whether the trial court’s result was an erroneous exercise of discretion. We do not consider what our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16
to whether the trial court’s result was an erroneous exercise of discretion. We do not consider what our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
description, analysis, and conclusion that these potential issues lack arguable merit, and we therefore do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
description, analysis, and conclusion that these potential issues lack arguable merit, and we therefore do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 15, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. Defendant Strutzel stated specifically that he was waiting for an estimate from someone who might do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28456 - 2007-03-14
. Defendant Strutzel stated specifically that he was waiting for an estimate from someone who might do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28456 - 2007-03-14
State v. Veronica L. Reiter
in the officer's squad car may not do a Terry pat-down to protect the officer from the possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9359 - 2005-03-31
in the officer's squad car may not do a Terry pat-down to protect the officer from the possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9359 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey G. Henschel
assertions of his trial counsel. This he cannot do and expect this court to reverse the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31
assertions of his trial counsel. This he cannot do and expect this court to reverse the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31