Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46941 - 46950 of 69007 for had.
Search results 46941 - 46950 of 69007 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
“in terms of the protection of the public.” The court observed Reeves had “[a] history of having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22
“in terms of the protection of the public.” The court observed Reeves had “[a] history of having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Corddry and Berg were divorced in January 2000 in Arapahoe County, Colorado. They had one minor child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
Corddry and Berg were divorced in January 2000 in Arapahoe County, Colorado. They had one minor child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
State v. Wayne Cornelius
Cornelius argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to demonstrate that he had the intent to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18658 - 2005-06-20
Cornelius argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to demonstrate that he had the intent to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18658 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the parent … of the child [has] not had a substantial parental relationship with the child.” WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198159 - 2017-10-24
that the parent … of the child [has] not had a substantial parental relationship with the child.” WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198159 - 2017-10-24
CA Blank Order
. § 48.315(2). At a scheduled pretrial conference, Aaron’s attorney confirmed that Aaron had missed two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137663 - 2015-03-17
. § 48.315(2). At a scheduled pretrial conference, Aaron’s attorney confirmed that Aaron had missed two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137663 - 2015-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and his counsel had multiple discussions over time as to the State’s plea offers, during which defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165018 - 2017-09-21
and his counsel had multiple discussions over time as to the State’s plea offers, during which defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert N. Pendleton
that they had discussed in great detail the allegations contained in the criminal complaint. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11232 - 2017-09-19
that they had discussed in great detail the allegations contained in the criminal complaint. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
erroneously concluded that res judicata bars the action. He also argues that the trial court judge had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11149 - 2017-09-19
erroneously concluded that res judicata bars the action. He also argues that the trial court judge had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11149 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
old when he was sentenced, had rehabilitative needs and concluded that he was “not at a point where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86884 - 2014-09-15
old when he was sentenced, had rehabilitative needs and concluded that he was “not at a point where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey J. Jacobsen
the Informing the Accused form. However, the testimony contains no suggestion that the officer had a reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7006 - 2017-09-20
the Informing the Accused form. However, the testimony contains no suggestion that the officer had a reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7006 - 2017-09-20