Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46951 - 46960 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46951 - 46960 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
also insists he was not sentenced on the individual merits of his case. We reject West’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31761 - 2014-09-15
also insists he was not sentenced on the individual merits of his case. We reject West’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31761 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
” deference cannot be used where the Commission has never previously decided a case with similar facts. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
” deference cannot be used where the Commission has never previously decided a case with similar facts. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William Gill v. City and Common Council of Oconomowoc
the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18858 - 2017-09-21
the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18858 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that an OWI was occurring was the bald assertion that the vehicle had weaved.” She states that no case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27352 - 2014-09-15
that an OWI was occurring was the bald assertion that the vehicle had weaved.” She states that no case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27352 - 2014-09-15
Richard Greene v. Allan S. Greene
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker testified in support of the default prove-up that LaDonna E. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker testified in support of the default prove-up that LaDonna E. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
State v. Michael S. Danforth
the case, and the trial court dismissed it without prejudice. The State refiled the charges against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7582 - 2005-03-31
the case, and the trial court dismissed it without prejudice. The State refiled the charges against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of alcohol. Pollack appeals. Discussion ¶9 As relevant to this case, the issues to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132742 - 2017-09-21
of alcohol. Pollack appeals. Discussion ¶9 As relevant to this case, the issues to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132742 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Clyde Sukanen v. School District of Monroe
of his argument that violation of this policy is unlawful, Sukanen cites several cases that stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4415 - 2017-09-19
of his argument that violation of this policy is unlawful, Sukanen cites several cases that stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4415 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case.” Id. at 52-53. ¶8 In this case, the circuit court awarded Jonathon’s retirement accounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154650 - 2017-09-21
of the case.” Id. at 52-53. ¶8 In this case, the circuit court awarded Jonathon’s retirement accounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154650 - 2017-09-21