Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46951 - 46960 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 46951 - 46960 of 83431 for simple case search.
State v. Michael L., Jr.
. See Wis. Stat. § 943.23(3). The case was plea bargained to the misdemeanor charge of violating Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
. See Wis. Stat. § 943.23(3). The case was plea bargained to the misdemeanor charge of violating Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
as to a proposed resolution of Gray’s multiple pending cases, and the parties informed the court that they had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107219 - 2014-01-21
as to a proposed resolution of Gray’s multiple pending cases, and the parties informed the court that they had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107219 - 2014-01-21
[PDF]
State v. Jo A. Kain
BROWN, P.J.1 The first issue is whether the arresting officer in this OWI/BAC case had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2778 - 2017-09-19
BROWN, P.J.1 The first issue is whether the arresting officer in this OWI/BAC case had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2778 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223567 - 2018-10-17
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223567 - 2018-10-17
[PDF]
Charles H. Johnson v. City of Greenfield Board of Review
2005 WI APP 156 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2209
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18452 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI APP 156 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2209
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18452 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the scheduled trial date (which caused him to remain in custody), made various remarks in the case attributing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252124 - 2020-01-16
the scheduled trial date (which caused him to remain in custody), made various remarks in the case attributing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252124 - 2020-01-16
COURT OF APPEALS
proceedings. ¶5 Postconviction counsel proceeded to evaluate Olson’s case. Subsequently, counsel moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
proceedings. ¶5 Postconviction counsel proceeded to evaluate Olson’s case. Subsequently, counsel moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
an amended complaint; and (4) dismissed his case on claim preclusion grounds.1 Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
an amended complaint; and (4) dismissed his case on claim preclusion grounds.1 Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shermell G. Tabor
2005 WI APP 107 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17874 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI APP 107 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17874 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the town board proceeded with a contested case hearing and concluded Esselman negligently obstructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180957 - 2017-09-21
, the town board proceeded with a contested case hearing and concluded Esselman negligently obstructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180957 - 2017-09-21