Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46991 - 47000 of 58618 for speedy trial.
Search results 46991 - 47000 of 58618 for speedy trial.
State v. Robert John Prihoda
be distinguished from the present case. The Siegel court apparently did not consider the changes the trial court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17420 - 2005-03-31
be distinguished from the present case. The Siegel court apparently did not consider the changes the trial court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17420 - 2005-03-31
WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP192 Complete Title of...
trial, the court imposed a stay pending our resolution of the appeal in a related case involving NCR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87326 - 2012-10-30
trial, the court imposed a stay pending our resolution of the appeal in a related case involving NCR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87326 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
WI App 61
Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. Alma Brown appeals the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81419 - 2014-09-15
Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. Alma Brown appeals the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81419 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John C. Widule
to purchase Royal Plastics' assets failed. In that appeal, the court of appeals wrote: The trial court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16536 - 2005-03-31
to purchase Royal Plastics' assets failed. In that appeal, the court of appeals wrote: The trial court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, claiming that the Assessments of the Mall were excessive. A court trial was held over the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913146 - 2025-02-11
, claiming that the Assessments of the Mall were excessive. A court trial was held over the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913146 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
State v. David C. Polashek
). Before trial, Polashek offered a jury instruction, which stated that to prove that the defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16394 - 2017-09-21
). Before trial, Polashek offered a jury instruction, which stated that to prove that the defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16394 - 2017-09-21
Jesus Ortega, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20 (1978). The scope of our review on certiorari is identical to that of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13125 - 2005-03-31
, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20 (1978). The scope of our review on certiorari is identical to that of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 108
. No. 2011AP192 4 ¶8 Ten days before trial, the court imposed a stay pending our resolution of the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87326 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2011AP192 4 ¶8 Ten days before trial, the court imposed a stay pending our resolution of the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87326 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
“to raise issues for post-divorce parenting” but “was used at trial to discredit him.” Michael further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835404 - 2024-08-06
“to raise issues for post-divorce parenting” but “was used at trial to discredit him.” Michael further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835404 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
William J. Toman v. Pamela A. Polenz
to the trial court’s discretion. We affirm a court’s discretionary determination when the court applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20634 - 2017-09-21
to the trial court’s discretion. We affirm a court’s discretionary determination when the court applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20634 - 2017-09-21