Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 471 - 480 of 68485 for did.
Search results 471 - 480 of 68485 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the battery. Although the victim turned over a recorded conversation to the detectives, the detectives did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
in the battery. Although the victim turned over a recorded conversation to the detectives, the detectives did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one of the jurors did not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21
have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one of the jurors did not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion without a hearing. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30231 - 2014-09-15
and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion without a hearing. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30231 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eugene E. Volk
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene E. Volk
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reconsideration request. We reach the merits and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30231 - 2007-09-11
reconsideration request. We reach the merits and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30231 - 2007-09-11
State v. Marlo U. Morales
in denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Because the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19876 - 2005-10-10
in denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Because the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19876 - 2005-10-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the jurors did not hear, or chose not to listen to, material portions of the trial. Specifically, Presby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
of the jurors did not hear, or chose not to listen to, material portions of the trial. Specifically, Presby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eugene E. Volk
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2510 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marlo U. Morales
the trial court did not err in summarily denying Morales’s motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19876 - 2017-09-21
the trial court did not err in summarily denying Morales’s motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19876 - 2017-09-21