Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 471 - 480 of 10262 for ed.
Search results 471 - 480 of 10262 for ed.
State v. Gary D. Kluczynski
that “it appear[ed] as though this jury was heading toward being hung” and that it “really only need[ed] one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26066 - 2006-08-01
that “it appear[ed] as though this jury was heading toward being hung” and that it “really only need[ed] one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26066 - 2006-08-01
[PDF]
Jerry Lu Epstein v. John T. Benson
-0522 -5- not then be the person [who] review[ed] the record and submit[ed] a proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8681 - 2017-09-19
-0522 -5- not then be the person [who] review[ed] the record and submit[ed] a proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8681 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“forc[ed] his representation upon Atkins” and “misrepresent[ed] Atkins[’] mental capacity” in order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968154 - 2025-06-10
“forc[ed] his representation upon Atkins” and “misrepresent[ed] Atkins[’] mental capacity” in order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968154 - 2025-06-10
State v. Allan N.
stating: "Allan [N.] fail[ed] to establish a substantial parental relationship with Kimeo [C.] before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
stating: "Allan [N.] fail[ed] to establish a substantial parental relationship with Kimeo [C.] before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lester H. Cook
as follows: [The court has] look[ed] at the record as a whole, not just the sentencing hearing, and of course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10222 - 2005-03-31
as follows: [The court has] look[ed] at the record as a whole, not just the sentencing hearing, and of course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10222 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
-to-members interpretation is not controlling because subsequent courts have not “explain[ed]” or “interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28270 - 2014-09-15
-to-members interpretation is not controlling because subsequent courts have not “explain[ed]” or “interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28270 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Allan N.
dissenting, found grounds for termination, returning verdicts stating: "Allan [N.] fail[ed] to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12254 - 2017-09-21
dissenting, found grounds for termination, returning verdicts stating: "Allan [N.] fail[ed] to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
DLK Enterprises, Inc. v. Alan J. Rogers
a judgment determining that a partnership existed between Rogers, Daniel Williams and Ed Joseph (the "Block
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9410 - 2017-09-19
a judgment determining that a partnership existed between Rogers, Daniel Williams and Ed Joseph (the "Block
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9410 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
] miss[ed] any of the various grounds that [Anderson] ha[d] alleged … or neglect[ed] to specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82293 - 2012-05-09
] miss[ed] any of the various grounds that [Anderson] ha[d] alleged … or neglect[ed] to specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82293 - 2012-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence “amount[ed] to an abuse of Judge Poppy’s discretion and is so disproportionate to the offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76100 - 2012-01-10
sentence “amount[ed] to an abuse of Judge Poppy’s discretion and is so disproportionate to the offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76100 - 2012-01-10