Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 471 - 480 of 839 for holt.

[PDF] Daniel Otte v. Yvonne Otte
to whether the circuit court misused its discretion. Weston v. Holt, 157 Wis. 2d 595, 602, 460 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3597 - 2017-09-19

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
. 1989) (cases should be decided on the “narrowest possible ground”); State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Barry Howard
that support it); State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985) (we will affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9583 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Wayne Bushberger
other than those presented to the trial court. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8968 - 2017-09-19

State v. Wayne Bushberger
. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985). [3] The search would be valid had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8968 - 2005-03-31

State v. Raymond A. Rosa
assault conviction. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 119‑20, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7089 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a lower court’s holding on a theory or reasoning not presented to the lower court. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
. 1989) (cases should be decided on the “narrowest possible ground”); State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5544 - 2005-03-31

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
. 1989) (cases should be decided on the “narrowest possible ground”); State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5545 - 2005-03-31

WI App 124 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2534 Complete Title...
a fiduciary duty to both the corporation and its shareholders. Yates v. Holt-Smith, 2009 WI App 79, ¶19, 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88300 - 2012-11-28