Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 471 - 480 of 9544 for jurors.
Search results 471 - 480 of 9544 for jurors.
[PDF]
State v. David J. Wolfe
for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors on the grounds of objective bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2832 - 2017-09-19
for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors on the grounds of objective bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2832 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David J. Wolfe
for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors on the grounds of objective bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15882 - 2017-09-21
for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors on the grounds of objective bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15882 - 2017-09-21
State v. David J. Wolfe
. § 980.02(2)(ag) (1999-2000);[1] for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2832 - 2005-03-31
. § 980.02(2)(ag) (1999-2000);[1] for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
(“defense counsel”) was ineffective for failing to peremptorily strike a particular (prospective) juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
(“defense counsel”) was ineffective for failing to peremptorily strike a particular (prospective) juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(“defense counsel”) was ineffective for failing to peremptorily strike a particular (prospective) juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2010-03-15
(“defense counsel”) was ineffective for failing to peremptorily strike a particular (prospective) juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2010-03-15
State v. Greg D. Griswold
is entitled to a new trial because of misconduct on the part of one of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9345 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to a new trial because of misconduct on the part of one of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9345 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Greg D. Griswold
to a new trial because of misconduct on the part of one of the jurors. If, as Griswold argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9345 - 2017-09-19
to a new trial because of misconduct on the part of one of the jurors. If, as Griswold argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9345 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to object to the circuit court’s order that jurors be identified only by their first names and juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810187 - 2024-06-06
to object to the circuit court’s order that jurors be identified only by their first names and juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810187 - 2024-06-06
[PDF]
State v. George S. Tulley
prospective jurors and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3264 - 2017-09-19
prospective jurors and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3264 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. George S. Tulley
prospective jurors and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3263 - 2017-09-19
prospective jurors and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3263 - 2017-09-19