Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 471 - 480 of 58328 for speedy trial.
Search results 471 - 480 of 58328 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Carl C. Gilbert, Jr
pretrial demands for a speedy trial, and the court denied Gilbert’s motion to dismiss for violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11539 - 2017-09-19
pretrial demands for a speedy trial, and the court denied Gilbert’s motion to dismiss for violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11539 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carl C. Gilbert
pretrial demands for a speedy trial, and the court denied Gilbert’s motion to dismiss for violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11538 - 2017-09-19
pretrial demands for a speedy trial, and the court denied Gilbert’s motion to dismiss for violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11538 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a speedy trial. ¶4 At a hearing on the suppression motion, the State indicated that it did not oppose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640670 - 2023-04-04
for a speedy trial. ¶4 At a hearing on the suppression motion, the State indicated that it did not oppose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640670 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Kane
to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in denying Kane’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15092 - 2017-09-21
to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in denying Kane’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shane M. Cook
was not timely held and because his right to a speedy trial was violated. We conclude that by pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4158 - 2017-09-20
was not timely held and because his right to a speedy trial was violated. We conclude that by pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4158 - 2017-09-20
State v. Shane M. Cook
to a speedy trial was violated. We conclude that by pleading no contest, Cook waived the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4158 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial was violated. We conclude that by pleading no contest, Cook waived the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Standard discovery protocol
conference, submission of joint final pretrial order, final pretrial conference, or trial. If an extension
/services/attorney/docs/discprotoc.pdf - 2019-10-23
conference, submission of joint final pretrial order, final pretrial conference, or trial. If an extension
/services/attorney/docs/discprotoc.pdf - 2019-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
a right to appeal a trial court’s prosecutorial delay ruling are speedy trial cases. See State v. Lemay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29108 - 2007-05-16
a right to appeal a trial court’s prosecutorial delay ruling are speedy trial cases. See State v. Lemay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29108 - 2007-05-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
a right to appeal a trial court’s prosecutorial delay ruling are speedy trial cases. See State v. Lemay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29108 - 2014-09-15
a right to appeal a trial court’s prosecutorial delay ruling are speedy trial cases. See State v. Lemay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Id. at 785-86. The court explained that the right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194750 - 2017-09-21
his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Id. at 785-86. The court explained that the right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194750 - 2017-09-21