Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47001 - 47010 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence pertaining to Emily’s condition that was relevant to the issue in this case. However, Bales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261502 - 2020-05-20

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joan M. Boyd
2006 WI 28 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP215-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24677 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Discussion ¶5 The issue in this case is whether the officer could stop Collins for a violation of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45733 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
in this case and only subsequently learned that the sentences in this case would not be served until some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31116 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
) and cases interpreting that statute ….”[3] State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d, 783, 793, 496 N.W.2d 701 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33049 - 2008-06-16

State v. LeRoy J. Dean, Jr.
. BACKGROUND Dean was convicted of forgery in case number 96-CF-58, bail-jumping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14690 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
converted. DISCUSSION ¶5 Restitution in criminal cases is governed by Wis. Stat. § 973.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59541 - 2011-01-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, 299 Wis. 2d 751, ¶26, states: “In the (hopefully) rare cases where a document would otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45004 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, 2005. On March 17, 2006, the trial court dismissed the suit, ruling: Looking at the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29388 - 2014-03-18

[PDF] State v. Patricia A. Weed
. 1 The importance of this statement for the State’s case is that Patricia’s having to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4032 - 2017-09-20