Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47011 - 47020 of 82978 for simple case search.

[PDF] Julie Ann Walberg v. St. Francis Home, Inc.
2004 WI App 120 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6765 - 2017-09-20

State v. John P. Ganzhorn
Ganzhorn was filed on July 20th. In sexual assault cases, the date of the offense does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12549 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
2001 WI App 201 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 00-1913
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2813 - 2017-09-19

Granville Rodgers v. City of Milwaukee
. § 227.48(2) applied only to “contested cases,” and that tenure decisions, under ch. 227, were not contested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14508 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
entered in this case. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 M.P. is the adjudicated father of N.L.P. and M.P.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197671 - 2017-10-20

[PDF] County of Dane v. Sherman C. Sporle
” that was breached by the arresting officer in this case. Sporle gave no indication that he wanted to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4476 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Nicholas S. Schreiner v. Up North Plastics, Inc.
2006 WI APP 138 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP1142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25491 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Chibardun Telephone Cooperative, Inc. v. CenturyTel Wireless of Wisconsin RSA #1, LLC
. ¶4 Under the partnership agreement, CTW holds approximately 42.2% of WRSA in this case. Chibardun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17985 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
established that government immunity applies in this case, and that Moss did not demonstrate that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422189 - 2021-09-08

[PDF] Soldiers of Jesus Christ, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be inappropriate to apply a de novo standard of review in this case. ¶8 In order for us to grant an agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15322 - 2017-09-21