Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47021 - 47030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 47021 - 47030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Miguel A. Segarra
” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 208. ¶9 The seminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6828 - 2014-07-16
” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 208. ¶9 The seminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6828 - 2014-07-16
Richard Greene v. Allan S. Greene
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Antjuan E.
However, the April O. and H.N. cases, and the other cases they discuss in which the trial court lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4231 - 2017-09-19
However, the April O. and H.N. cases, and the other cases they discuss in which the trial court lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4231 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (guardianship petition “shall be heard within 90 days after it is filed”).1 In this case, the guardianship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83344 - 2014-09-15
) (guardianship petition “shall be heard within 90 days after it is filed”).1 In this case, the guardianship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, tried to trade cases just before surgery; without explanation, he at times arrived late for cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208181 - 2018-02-14
, tried to trade cases just before surgery; without explanation, he at times arrived late for cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208181 - 2018-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165724 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The charges in this case arose from the burglary of a residential property. The probable cause portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359954 - 2021-04-27
The charges in this case arose from the burglary of a residential property. The probable cause portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359954 - 2021-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case would not settle. ¶3 Schlimgen admitted that he looked up Ehrett on the online Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129364 - 2017-09-21
the case would not settle. ¶3 Schlimgen admitted that he looked up Ehrett on the online Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129364 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
[PDF]
Sybil Drabek v. Floyd Rasmussen
. The Trial Court Erred by Dismissing Drabek’s Case Drabek argues that dismissal was improper because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12402 - 2017-09-21
. The Trial Court Erred by Dismissing Drabek’s Case Drabek argues that dismissal was improper because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12402 - 2017-09-21