Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47021 - 47030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 47021 - 47030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker testified in support of the default prove-up that LaDonna E. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker testified in support of the default prove-up that LaDonna E. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3704 - 2005-03-31
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3704 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3705 - 2005-03-31
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3705 - 2005-03-31
Richard Greene v. Allan S. Greene
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2011-01-27
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2011-01-27
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Joseph P. Ross
Delivery address. ¶5 On September 29, 2003, the case was called for trial. Ross failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7224 - 2017-09-20
Delivery address. ¶5 On September 29, 2003, the case was called for trial. Ross failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7224 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Henry Bloomfield
“something to the effect, this is my case, you had your case, and butt out.” Defense counsel argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
“something to the effect, this is my case, you had your case, and butt out.” Defense counsel argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
an arbitrary decision. This was not the case here. In fact, many of the factors from the Wollman test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30618 - 2014-09-15
an arbitrary decision. This was not the case here. In fact, many of the factors from the Wollman test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30618 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
facts in the present case demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances. First, Dale’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58078 - 2014-09-15
facts in the present case demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances. First, Dale’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58078 - 2014-09-15
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Antjuan E.
. and H.N. cases, and the other cases they discuss in which the trial court lost competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4231 - 2005-03-31
. and H.N. cases, and the other cases they discuss in which the trial court lost competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4231 - 2005-03-31