Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47041 - 47050 of 74828 for public records.
Search results 47041 - 47050 of 74828 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07 motion for relief if the record shows that the court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
. § 806.07 motion for relief if the record shows that the court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
Julie D. v. Derek P.
. 1994). To demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion, the record need merely reflect a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
. 1994). To demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion, the record need merely reflect a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
been deemed to be incompetent.” We review the record in the light most favorable to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108161 - 2014-02-17
been deemed to be incompetent.” We review the record in the light most favorable to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108161 - 2014-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
medical records. Kundert had initially agreed to provide the records to counsel defending Westerhof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606368 - 2022-12-30
medical records. Kundert had initially agreed to provide the records to counsel defending Westerhof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606368 - 2022-12-30
State v. Thomas G. Kramer
to electronically record the interrogations in which they were made; and (3) Kramer’s constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
to electronically record the interrogations in which they were made; and (3) Kramer’s constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312939 - 2020-12-15
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312939 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record on appeal and we base our review on the characterizations in the record. See State v. Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488986 - 2022-03-01
in the record on appeal and we base our review on the characterizations in the record. See State v. Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488986 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
. An easement recorded in 1955 permits the owners of the Jacobs’ property to use French Road for ingress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56782 - 2014-09-15
. An easement recorded in 1955 permits the owners of the Jacobs’ property to use French Road for ingress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56782 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Neona C.
that the trial court failed to exercise discretion on the record, and thus erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6608 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court failed to exercise discretion on the record, and thus erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6608 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas G. Kramer
because the State deliberately failed to electronically record the interrogations in which they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25442 - 2017-09-21
because the State deliberately failed to electronically record the interrogations in which they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25442 - 2017-09-21