Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47081 - 47090 of 68502 for did.
Search results 47081 - 47090 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the resentencing record. The resentencing court did not focus on the victims’ ages. However, we point out
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185123 - 2017-09-21
the resentencing record. The resentencing court did not focus on the victims’ ages. However, we point out
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the vehicle. Folkman argued the stop was unlawful because Klenke needed, but did not have, “some exigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105544 - 2017-09-21
the vehicle. Folkman argued the stop was unlawful because Klenke needed, but did not have, “some exigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 908.01(1), 1 we are satisfied there was no prejudice because the comment did little
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 908.01(1), 1 we are satisfied there was no prejudice because the comment did little
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
State v. Casey J. Schneck
the commitment statutes are silent on the matter of substitution and therefore did not provide a “different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
the commitment statutes are silent on the matter of substitution and therefore did not provide a “different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
goals. See id., ¶¶41-43. In this case, the court considered appropriate factors, did not consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546510 - 2022-07-21
goals. See id., ¶¶41-43. In this case, the court considered appropriate factors, did not consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546510 - 2022-07-21
State v. Michael L. Morris
clearly shows that the court did not consider the content of the federal presentence report and continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3614 - 2005-03-31
clearly shows that the court did not consider the content of the federal presentence report and continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas W. Nelson v. John L. McLaughlin
for Mutual Service's $100,000 per person policy limits. Mutual Service did not accept this offer. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10074 - 2017-09-19
for Mutual Service's $100,000 per person policy limits. Mutual Service did not accept this offer. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10074 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patricia Marie F-K.
in admitting certain “other acts” evidence. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15037 - 2017-09-21
in admitting certain “other acts” evidence. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15037 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not testify. However, the jury heard testimony from a deputy relating post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249753 - 2019-11-07
did not testify. However, the jury heard testimony from a deputy relating post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249753 - 2019-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court. ¶9 As mitigating factors, the circuit court acknowledged Williams did not demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132813 - 2017-09-21
to the circuit court. ¶9 As mitigating factors, the circuit court acknowledged Williams did not demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132813 - 2017-09-21