Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4711 - 4720 of 13003 for divorce for ms.
Search results 4711 - 4720 of 13003 for divorce for ms.
City of Princeton v. Karen E. Grams
the City from retesting the sample for drugs in order to prosecute Ms. Grams again if it does not prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24894 - 2006-04-25
the City from retesting the sample for drugs in order to prosecute Ms. Grams again if it does not prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24894 - 2006-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
during that time. The court concluded: Ms. Merriwether testified credibly that there was no intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
during that time. The court concluded: Ms. Merriwether testified credibly that there was no intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant has the burden at this stage of the proceedings? MS. BUNCH [Assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2013-04-22
the defendant has the burden at this stage of the proceedings? MS. BUNCH [Assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2013-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
near the end of the discussion: “Based on my examination of the exhibits, I conclude that Ms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
near the end of the discussion: “Based on my examination of the exhibits, I conclude that Ms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
Ellen S. Krueger v. Douglas A. Krueger
that part of a divorce judgment awarding her $35,000 annual maintenance.[1] She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11036 - 2005-03-31
that part of a divorce judgment awarding her $35,000 annual maintenance.[1] She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
George R. Hardy v. Christine Hardy
affirm. No. 00-2244 2 ¶2 The facts are not in dispute. The parties divorced in 1976 without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2931 - 2017-09-19
affirm. No. 00-2244 2 ¶2 The facts are not in dispute. The parties divorced in 1976 without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
Estate 94% 43 118 5 1 124 109 5 0 114 (2) 51 Other Civil 100% 13 70 2 0 72 66 2 0 68 (4) 13 Divorce 94
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty17.pdf - 2018-02-09
Estate 94% 43 118 5 1 124 109 5 0 114 (2) 51 Other Civil 100% 13 70 2 0 72 66 2 0 68 (4) 13 Divorce 94
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty17.pdf - 2018-02-09
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
19 0 122 (2) 14 Divorce 91% 42 66 48 4 118 58 48 1 107 0 53 Paternity 119% 9 27 3 0 30 34 3 0 37 1
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty15.pdf - 2016-02-25
19 0 122 (2) 14 Divorce 91% 42 66 48 4 118 58 48 1 107 0 53 Paternity 119% 9 27 3 0 30 34 3 0 37 1
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty15.pdf - 2016-02-25
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
Divorce 100% 51 71 1 0 72 74 1 0 75 3 51 Paternity 88% 2 33 0 1 34 29 0 1 30 0 6 Other Family 107% 3 30
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty16.pdf - 2017-03-07
Divorce 100% 51 71 1 0 72 74 1 0 75 3 51 Paternity 88% 2 33 0 1 34 29 0 1 30 0 6 Other Family 107% 3 30
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty16.pdf - 2017-03-07
[PDF]
Clearanance rate: county and district
Estate 112% 61 121 3 0 124 128 3 0 131 (8) 46 Other Civil 106% 12 76 3 2 81 83 3 0 86 0 7 Divorce 101
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty14.pdf - 2015-03-05
Estate 112% 61 121 3 0 124 128 3 0 131 (8) 46 Other Civil 106% 12 76 3 2 81 83 3 0 86 0 7 Divorce 101
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty14.pdf - 2015-03-05