Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47101 - 47110 of 57632 for id.
Search results 47101 - 47110 of 57632 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the presumption that the BOA’s determination is correct. See id., ¶50. “The evidentiary test on certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
the presumption that the BOA’s determination is correct. See id., ¶50. “The evidentiary test on certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
State v. Timothy J. Pluemer
of fact based on the testimony presented at the hearing. See id. In this case, the parties apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19708 - 2005-09-21
of fact based on the testimony presented at the hearing. See id. In this case, the parties apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19708 - 2005-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a finality statement on a document, however, does not render a final order nonfinal. See id., ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143868 - 2017-09-21
a finality statement on a document, however, does not render a final order nonfinal. See id., ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143868 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Turner
theories of the crime. See id. at 507-08. An appellate court need only decide whether the theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15749 - 2017-09-21
theories of the crime. See id. at 507-08. An appellate court need only decide whether the theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15749 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the rights to notice and the opportunity to present a defense. Id. These rights are not prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225412 - 2018-10-30
the rights to notice and the opportunity to present a defense. Id. These rights are not prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225412 - 2018-10-30
Jacquie Hur v. LaVerne Holler
based on the appropriate legal principles and facts of record." Id. at 153, 502 N.W.2d at 925. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2013-01-31
based on the appropriate legal principles and facts of record." Id. at 153, 502 N.W.2d at 925. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2013-01-31
State v. Terrell A. Coleman
from the standpoint of the accused.”’” Id. (citations omitted). “‘Ultimate resolution of the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8859 - 2005-03-31
from the standpoint of the accused.”’” Id. (citations omitted). “‘Ultimate resolution of the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8859 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶11 Civil commitments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575375 - 2022-10-11
the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶11 Civil commitments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575375 - 2022-10-11
Charter Northbrooke Behavioral Health System, Inc. v. Village of Brown Deer
the assessment. See id., 72 Wis.2d at 662, 242 N.W.2d at 684. ¶8 Section 70.32(1), Stats., governs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14379 - 2005-03-31
the assessment. See id., 72 Wis.2d at 662, 242 N.W.2d at 684. ¶8 Section 70.32(1), Stats., governs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14379 - 2005-03-31
Robin C. Acker v. Lawrence P. Sullivan, M.D.
is a question of law.” Id. Sullivan's argument that Mrs. Acker lost only a one percent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8465 - 2008-09-10
is a question of law.” Id. Sullivan's argument that Mrs. Acker lost only a one percent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8465 - 2008-09-10