Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47101 - 47110 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 47101 - 47110 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
Dale G. Eisner v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
contended that the jury’s $150,000 damage award was excessive. Finally, North American claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16311 - 2005-03-31
contended that the jury’s $150,000 damage award was excessive. Finally, North American claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The circuit court denied the motion, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶6 Groves first claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38806 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court denied the motion, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶6 Groves first claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38806 - 2014-09-15
State v. Aretus S. Fenn
claims that the record does not support the trial court’s conclusion that Zapora was still under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13401 - 2005-03-31
claims that the record does not support the trial court’s conclusion that Zapora was still under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13401 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Certification
: 1. The movant claims that he or she is innocent of the offense at issue in the motion under sub
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102552 - 2017-09-21
: 1. The movant claims that he or she is innocent of the offense at issue in the motion under sub
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102552 - 2017-09-21
William Alexander v. City of Madison
the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to the City of Madison on his claim that ordinances that provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3107 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to the City of Madison on his claim that ordinances that provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3107 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
claims that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the convictions. We review the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38806 - 2009-08-03
claims that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the convictions. We review the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38806 - 2009-08-03
State v. Renee D.
Renee and Johnny both claim the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5846 - 2005-03-31
Renee and Johnny both claim the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
grounds must complete the ICRS procedure before seeking judicial review on either claim), abrogated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
grounds must complete the ICRS procedure before seeking judicial review on either claim), abrogated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
State v. Renee D.
Renee and Johnny both claim the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5673 - 2005-03-31
Renee and Johnny both claim the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5673 - 2005-03-31
Margaret R. Cierzan v. Jessica Kriegel
was a person “in [Kriegel’s] care” under subsection c on the night of the fire.[2] ¶9 Pella claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5227 - 2005-03-31
was a person “in [Kriegel’s] care” under subsection c on the night of the fire.[2] ¶9 Pella claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5227 - 2005-03-31