Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47181 - 47190 of 68502 for did.
Search results 47181 - 47190 of 68502 for did.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. M. Joanne Wolf
. In fact, Attorney Wolf had not at that time filed the divorce petition and did not do so until March 31
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16436 - 2005-03-31
. In fact, Attorney Wolf had not at that time filed the divorce petition and did not do so until March 31
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Wolf
in a presumption of prejudice, particularly because the Wolfs did not expressly agree to the deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16196 - 2017-09-21
in a presumption of prejudice, particularly because the Wolfs did not expressly agree to the deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16196 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
did not specifically address any other topic covered by the plea questionnaire before concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122843 - 2014-09-30
did not specifically address any other topic covered by the plea questionnaire before concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122843 - 2014-09-30
Diane L. C. v. Michael D. P.
Because we have concluded that Michael D.P. appeared before the court, it is inescapable that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18393 - 2005-06-01
Because we have concluded that Michael D.P. appeared before the court, it is inescapable that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18393 - 2005-06-01
[PDF]
Frontsheet
and the court remarked they had not received the affidavit. Electronic court records did not show a record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115776 - 2017-09-21
and the court remarked they had not received the affidavit. Electronic court records did not show a record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115776 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
that we decrease his sentence by that amount. Because we conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
that we decrease his sentence by that amount. Because we conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel. Schmaling did not attach relevant portions of the record from the earlier case to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
assistance of counsel. Schmaling did not attach relevant portions of the record from the earlier case to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
2009 WI APP 13
with the trial court, which did not include provisions for Kristopher M.W.’s support. The court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34652 - 2009-01-27
with the trial court, which did not include provisions for Kristopher M.W.’s support. The court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34652 - 2009-01-27
CA Blank Order
. She explained that she did not believe that she was mentally diseased, and also did not believe she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104355 - 2013-11-11
. She explained that she did not believe that she was mentally diseased, and also did not believe she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104355 - 2013-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deceiving, however, because Mr. Cooper did not know at the time of the plea that the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21
deceiving, however, because Mr. Cooper did not know at the time of the plea that the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21