Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4721 - 4730 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 4721 - 4730 of 69399 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and ordered involuntary medication and treatment during that time.2 J.D.J. claims he is not dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593401 - 2022-11-23
and ordered involuntary medication and treatment during that time.2 J.D.J. claims he is not dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593401 - 2022-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. He contends that prosecutorial misconduct in the form of inappropriate rebuttal argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87126 - 2012-09-18
for postconviction relief. He contends that prosecutorial misconduct in the form of inappropriate rebuttal argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87126 - 2012-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The victim testified at trial that he was driving home from work
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619427 - 2023-02-07
of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The victim testified at trial that he was driving home from work
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619427 - 2023-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing misallocating the burden of proof undermined his plea. He argues in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
hearing misallocating the burden of proof undermined his plea. He argues in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying postconviction relief. Duke claims he is entitled to a new trial because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
and an order denying postconviction relief. Duke claims he is entitled to a new trial because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Chad D. Everts
. Everts further argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on this misinformation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
. Everts further argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on this misinformation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. He contends that prosecutorial No. 2011AP1759-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87126 - 2014-09-15
motion for postconviction relief. He contends that prosecutorial No. 2011AP1759-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
investigate information critical to witnesses’ credibility; (3) he should be granted a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
investigate information critical to witnesses’ credibility; (3) he should be granted a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
entered after he pled guilty to armed robbery, contrary to WIS. STAT. No. 2004AP3045-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20327 - 2014-09-15
entered after he pled guilty to armed robbery, contrary to WIS. STAT. No. 2004AP3045-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20327 - 2014-09-15
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] He contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] He contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31