Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4721 - 4730 of 29928 for des.
Search results 4721 - 4730 of 29928 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Taylor v. Taylor, 2002 WI App 253, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670967 - 2023-06-22
interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Taylor v. Taylor, 2002 WI App 253, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670967 - 2023-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, we review the court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548405 - 2022-07-27
. However, we review the court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548405 - 2022-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862785 - 2024-11-07
to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862785 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court reviews de novo.” Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76, ¶13, 311 Wis. 2d 1, 751
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
, which this court reviews de novo.” Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76, ¶13, 311 Wis. 2d 1, 751
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980102 - 2025-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the question” de novo. Olson v. Farrar, 2012 WI 3, ¶24, 338 Wis. 2d 215, 809 N.W.2d 1. “We review a grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399165 - 2021-07-27
the question” de novo. Olson v. Farrar, 2012 WI 3, ¶24, 338 Wis. 2d 215, 809 N.W.2d 1. “We review a grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399165 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
State v. James Lalor
of whether the State met its burden of proof, an issue we review de novo. See Hallin v. Hallin, 228 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2830 - 2017-09-19
of whether the State met its burden of proof, an issue we review de novo. See Hallin v. Hallin, 228 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2830 - 2017-09-19
John M. Maciolek v. Patrick L. Ross
review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26544 - 2006-09-20
review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26544 - 2006-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214763 - 2018-06-26
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214763 - 2018-06-26
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
distinct levels of deference to agency interpretations of statutes: great weight, due weight and de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
distinct levels of deference to agency interpretations of statutes: great weight, due weight and de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Westhaven Associates, Ltd. v. C.C. of Madison, Inc.
judgment. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4210 - 2017-09-19
judgment. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4210 - 2017-09-19