Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4721 - 4730 of 20941 for word.
Search results 4721 - 4730 of 20941 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
of cocaine. [STATE]: Is that a common word that you use in your practice as an undercover officer? [OFFICER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71564 - 2011-10-03
of cocaine. [STATE]: Is that a common word that you use in your practice as an undercover officer? [OFFICER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71564 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Mark Sevelin
first inquiry is whether the words of the statute have an unambiguous meaning. Bindrim v. B. & J. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10531 - 2017-09-20
first inquiry is whether the words of the statute have an unambiguous meaning. Bindrim v. B. & J. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10531 - 2017-09-20
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Judith A. Pinchar
as "Client's Account" or "Trust Account" or words of similar import. No funds belonging to the lawyer or law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16686 - 2005-03-31
as "Client's Account" or "Trust Account" or words of similar import. No funds belonging to the lawyer or law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Owen v. Rodney Satonica
witnesses testified that Satonica’s words and actions caused them to fear for their own safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11624 - 2017-09-19
witnesses testified that Satonica’s words and actions caused them to fear for their own safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11624 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument appears to confuse the standards for perfect and imperfect self-defense. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66422 - 2014-09-15
argument appears to confuse the standards for perfect and imperfect self-defense. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66422 - 2014-09-15
Peter P. Grandaw v. David H. Schwarz
certain words on the audio tape of the hearing are inaudible, he has been denied a meaningful right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3386 - 2005-03-31
certain words on the audio tape of the hearing are inaudible, he has been denied a meaningful right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not use the word “foreseeable,” many of his opinions quite obviously went to that criterion. Neary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739074 - 2023-12-13
not use the word “foreseeable,” many of his opinions quite obviously went to that criterion. Neary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739074 - 2023-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the State, assuming that the defense has been properly raised.” Id. In other words, “[t]here must exist
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185243 - 2017-09-21
the State, assuming that the defense has been properly raised.” Id. In other words, “[t]here must exist
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185243 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
coordinator, information processing, receptionist, secretary, transcriptionist, [or] word processor.” Veith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168387 - 2017-09-21
coordinator, information processing, receptionist, secretary, transcriptionist, [or] word processor.” Veith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
explained that it “did not attribute those words to” Dixon and that, instead, “[i]t was the Court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220238 - 2018-10-03
explained that it “did not attribute those words to” Dixon and that, instead, “[i]t was the Court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220238 - 2018-10-03