Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47211 - 47220 of 64160 for records.
Search results 47211 - 47220 of 64160 for records.
State v. Paul Williams
, and stated on the record that he made this choice voluntarily after thoroughly discussing the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11994 - 2005-03-31
, and stated on the record that he made this choice voluntarily after thoroughly discussing the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11994 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Martindale
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of knowledge of his right to counsel, counsel’s functions and the potential penalties. ¶5 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57302 - 2010-12-06
of knowledge of his right to counsel, counsel’s functions and the potential penalties. ¶5 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57302 - 2010-12-06
[PDF]
State v. James W. McMillen
arguable merit. This court's independent review of the record did not disclose any additional potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8360 - 2017-09-19
arguable merit. This court's independent review of the record did not disclose any additional potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8360 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the department’s letter, and opposed the request. Jensen’s counsel argued there was an insufficient record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50570 - 2014-09-15
on the department’s letter, and opposed the request. Jensen’s counsel argued there was an insufficient record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50570 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his request to obtain an interest in property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875399 - 2024-11-14
his request to obtain an interest in property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875399 - 2024-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210039 - 2018-03-19
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210039 - 2018-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Industry Review Commission (the Commission). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868556 - 2024-10-29
and Industry Review Commission (the Commission). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868556 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108908 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108908 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark W. Albers
on Albers’ driving record, separate complaints charged Albers with fifth and sixth OWI offenses. In both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7282 - 2005-03-31
on Albers’ driving record, separate complaints charged Albers with fifth and sixth OWI offenses. In both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7282 - 2005-03-31