Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47221 - 47230 of 55321 for n c.
Search results 47221 - 47230 of 55321 for n c.
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
with the appeal is mandatory rather than directory. C. Service on City Clerk. ¶8 In a one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
with the appeal is mandatory rather than directory. C. Service on City Clerk. ¶8 In a one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
City of New Berlin v. William P. Servi
. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
for Dane County: c. william foust, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28800 - 2007-04-25
for Dane County: c. william foust, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28800 - 2007-04-25
[PDF]
Joshua Beaulieu v. David H. Schwarz
In Wisconsin, rules of evidence do not apply at revocation hearings. See WIS. STAT. § 911.01(4)(c). However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4145 - 2017-09-20
In Wisconsin, rules of evidence do not apply at revocation hearings. See WIS. STAT. § 911.01(4)(c). However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4145 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
raised); see also State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
raised); see also State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
issues generically, as A, B, or C, without discussing the merits of the actual issues in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357941 - 2021-04-20
issues generically, as A, B, or C, without discussing the merits of the actual issues in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357941 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
Bethann Burazin Zaffiro v. Richard Lawrence Zaffiro
(29% of her annual income of $12,000, divided by 12 months). WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DWD 40.03(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6990 - 2017-09-20
(29% of her annual income of $12,000, divided by 12 months). WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DWD 40.03(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6990 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Billye L. Massey
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
. WELKER and EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judges. Affirmed. Before Eich, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13096 - 2017-09-21
. WELKER and EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judges. Affirmed. Before Eich, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13096 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terrance J. W.
on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10131 - 2005-03-31
on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10131 - 2005-03-31