Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47221 - 47230 of 59635 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 47221 - 47230 of 59635 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In response to the no-merit report, Torres-Fernandez claims he is innocent of the crimes for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735169 - 2023-12-05
. In response to the no-merit report, Torres-Fernandez claims he is innocent of the crimes for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735169 - 2023-12-05
Debra A. Maki v. Kathleen W. Allen
, J.[1] Kathleen W. Allen and her husband, Randolph S. Allen, arguing pro se, appeal a small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2005-03-31
, J.[1] Kathleen W. Allen and her husband, Randolph S. Allen, arguing pro se, appeal a small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David L.s.
, the record establishes that this claim is also without merit. Our independent review of the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8796 - 2017-09-19
, the record establishes that this claim is also without merit. Our independent review of the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8796 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel effectively advocated on behalf of his client. There would be no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606054 - 2022-12-29
counsel effectively advocated on behalf of his client. There would be no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606054 - 2022-12-29
CA Blank Order
for the Earned Release Program was a new factor justifying sentence modification. Review of a “new factor” claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102924 - 2013-10-14
for the Earned Release Program was a new factor justifying sentence modification. Review of a “new factor” claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102924 - 2013-10-14
State v. Michael A. Myers
of the trial court’s discretion for refusing to conduct a postconviction hearing on Myers’ claim that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3310 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s discretion for refusing to conduct a postconviction hearing on Myers’ claim that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3310 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
clarification.[2] He claims the trial court erred in concluding that the sentence imposed was to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
clarification.[2] He claims the trial court erred in concluding that the sentence imposed was to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98006 - 2013-06-10
assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98006 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that any challenge to the orders claiming a procedural error would be wholly frivolous. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480223 - 2022-02-03
that any challenge to the orders claiming a procedural error would be wholly frivolous. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480223 - 2022-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP1135 2 limitations for this claim is three years; that the starting date for that period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293133 - 2020-10-01
. No. 2019AP1135 2 limitations for this claim is three years; that the starting date for that period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293133 - 2020-10-01