Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47231 - 47240 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
Search results 47231 - 47240 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
Theresa Ann Johnson v. Gareth R. Johnson
… in each individual case. Id. Thus, maintenance is to be calculated not at “bare subsistence levels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15577 - 2005-03-31
… in each individual case. Id. Thus, maintenance is to be calculated not at “bare subsistence levels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15577 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. At trial, one of the officers investigating the case was asked by the State: “Okay. And when you spoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34607 - 2008-11-17
. At trial, one of the officers investigating the case was asked by the State: “Okay. And when you spoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34607 - 2008-11-17
East of the River Enterprises II v. City of Hudson
Amendment rights to present sexually explicit entertainment. It cites cases in which the City prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15735 - 2005-03-31
Amendment rights to present sexually explicit entertainment. It cites cases in which the City prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15735 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and has not filed a response. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576041 - 2022-10-13
of the report and has not filed a response. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576041 - 2022-10-13
[PDF]
State v. Deandra S. Carter
was inadmissible. Because the officers in this case had no reasonable suspicion for stopping Carter, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12704 - 2017-09-21
was inadmissible. Because the officers in this case had no reasonable suspicion for stopping Carter, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12704 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP248 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976202 - 2025-07-01
. No. 2024AP248 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976202 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
State v. Dennis M. Makovsky
of the evidence. He also argued that the trial court prejudged the case, drew irrational and illogical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13528 - 2017-09-21
of the evidence. He also argued that the trial court prejudged the case, drew irrational and illogical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13528 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136999 - 2015-03-05
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136999 - 2015-03-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
intoxicated. The circuit court denied his suppression motion, noting “this wasn’t a case of Lonergan simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50231 - 2014-09-15
intoxicated. The circuit court denied his suppression motion, noting “this wasn’t a case of Lonergan simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50231 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21