Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47231 - 47240 of 68290 for did.
Search results 47231 - 47240 of 68290 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s ruling at the suppression hearing did not violate Lebese’s due process rights, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50966 - 2010-06-15
court’s ruling at the suppression hearing did not violate Lebese’s due process rights, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50966 - 2010-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in 2001 and did not have any children together. Herbert filed a petition for divorce on May 23, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338854 - 2021-02-25
in 2001 and did not have any children together. Herbert filed a petition for divorce on May 23, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338854 - 2021-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
days of custody from 2010 did not relate to count three, but it had decided to apply 92 of those 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78232 - 2014-09-15
days of custody from 2010 did not relate to count three, but it had decided to apply 92 of those 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78232 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement and did not reflect the court’s actual reliance in ordering the bifurcated sentence upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
statement and did not reflect the court’s actual reliance in ordering the bifurcated sentence upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Margaret Smith v. Richard Golde
that because Smith did not raise this issue in the trial court, she waived any right to do so. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3384 - 2017-09-19
that because Smith did not raise this issue in the trial court, she waived any right to do so. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
was intentional. The circuit court did not address either of these points in its decision, although both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43878 - 2014-09-15
was intentional. The circuit court did not address either of these points in its decision, although both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43878 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Davies
will be able to act impartially.” Id. Because Judge Schroeder did not disqualify himself, it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16334 - 2017-09-21
will be able to act impartially.” Id. Because Judge Schroeder did not disqualify himself, it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of felony escape, Niemczyk indicated to defense counsel immediately before the plea hearing that she did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92004 - 2014-09-15
of felony escape, Niemczyk indicated to defense counsel immediately before the plea hearing that she did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92004 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Belinda C. Wolf
in a presumption of prejudice, particularly because the Wolfs did not expressly agree to the deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16197 - 2017-09-21
in a presumption of prejudice, particularly because the Wolfs did not expressly agree to the deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16197 - 2017-09-21
Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
as nonparties to the contract. Because the contract that defined the parties’ obligations to one another did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31
as nonparties to the contract. Because the contract that defined the parties’ obligations to one another did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31