Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47231 - 47240 of 57632 for id.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id. ¶5 Bradley established neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130674 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
factor is committed to the court’s discretion. Id. The record reveals that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28

COURT OF APPEALS
intended to bind each other to a different relationship.” Id. at 979. Thus, in its summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105619 - 2013-12-16

COURT OF APPEALS
for the mistake of law, the defendant has the right to withdraw the plea. See id., ¶13. ¶8 The State does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33804 - 2008-08-20

State v. Lee Anton Jackson
on the record the material factors which influenced its decision.” See id. at 337, 351 N.W.2d at 744
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10749 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by denying sentence modification. Id., ¶38 (“[I]f the court determines that in the exercise of its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157078 - 2017-09-21

State v. James Terry II
, is left to the trial court’s broad discretion. Id. at 264 (citations omitted). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3078 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudice components if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one. Id. at 697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134400 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id., ¶37 (citation omitted). A reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174534 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
of the dismissal is de novo. See id., ¶4. Issues of statutory interpretation are also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1101646 - 2026-04-08