Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47231 - 47240 of 74840 for public records.
Search results 47231 - 47240 of 74840 for public records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
misrepresents the record to this court. The Town includes in the appendix to its brief a handwritten document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49183 - 2014-09-15
misrepresents the record to this court. The Town includes in the appendix to its brief a handwritten document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49183 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report addressing Dolecki’s claims. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619227 - 2023-02-07
a supplemental no-merit report addressing Dolecki’s claims. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619227 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the officers that the CAD report fell under the business records exception. See WIS. STAT. § 908.03(6). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197982 - 2017-10-18
the officers that the CAD report fell under the business records exception. See WIS. STAT. § 908.03(6). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197982 - 2017-10-18
State v. Ronald H. Gilpin
. During Gilpin’s trial, the State introduced a certified copy of Gilpin’s driving record—showing three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14263 - 2012-12-17
. During Gilpin’s trial, the State introduced a certified copy of Gilpin’s driving record—showing three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14263 - 2012-12-17
State v. William Speener
or recanted altogether; (6) trial counsel failed to record pre-trial conversations with Linda R., which might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12022 - 2005-03-31
or recanted altogether; (6) trial counsel failed to record pre-trial conversations with Linda R., which might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12022 - 2005-03-31
Sara M. Sandberg v. John P. Donahue
the facts appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.”). Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6238 - 2005-03-31
the facts appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.”). Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6238 - 2005-03-31
Jasmine J.E. v. John E.P.
. John P. argues, without elaboration or discussion of the facts of record,[4] that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8899 - 2005-03-31
. John P. argues, without elaboration or discussion of the facts of record,[4] that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8899 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
A fire severely damaged Eubanks’s two-flat house. There is conflicting information in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113667 - 2014-06-03
A fire severely damaged Eubanks’s two-flat house. There is conflicting information in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113667 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Lonny Mayer
telephone conversations are recorded. On July 2, 2002, at 1:27 p.m., Mayer talked by telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6870 - 2017-09-20
telephone conversations are recorded. On July 2, 2002, at 1:27 p.m., Mayer talked by telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6870 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record demonstrates no entitlement to relief, the court may deny the motion without a hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54147 - 2010-09-07
, or if the record demonstrates no entitlement to relief, the court may deny the motion without a hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54147 - 2010-09-07