Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47251 - 47260 of 84365 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 47251 - 47260 of 84365 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Brian M. Christopher
This case is similar to Rutzinski in which the supreme court determined that information provided in a cell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4394 - 2005-03-31
This case is similar to Rutzinski in which the supreme court determined that information provided in a cell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4394 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214796 - 2018-06-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214796 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. DeMars
does not discuss the particular facts of his case. Rather, he asserts that when a person is removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5977 - 2017-09-19
does not discuss the particular facts of his case. Rather, he asserts that when a person is removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5977 - 2017-09-19
Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
requirement. This case involves a question of statutory interpretation that presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12882 - 2005-03-31
requirement. This case involves a question of statutory interpretation that presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12882 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl P. Fike
, that this is not an instructional error but an error of the wrong fact-finding entity adjudicating guilt, other case law supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
, that this is not an instructional error but an error of the wrong fact-finding entity adjudicating guilt, other case law supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107294 - 2014-01-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107294 - 2014-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Milligan
is consequential to an issue in the case and would have changed the result of the proceeding. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2346 - 2017-09-19
is consequential to an issue in the case and would have changed the result of the proceeding. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2346 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13