Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47291 - 47300 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 47291 - 47300 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125439 - 2014-10-27
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125439 - 2014-10-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. RULE 809.21. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2007CM3999, the State charged Krumrei
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92790 - 2014-09-15
. RULE 809.21. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2007CM3999, the State charged Krumrei
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92790 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is necessary, of course, will vary from case to case.” Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶39. “[W]e require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56739 - 2010-11-16
is necessary, of course, will vary from case to case.” Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶39. “[W]e require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56739 - 2010-11-16
[PDF]
Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
regarding the standard of review on the issue of prejudice. Several cases suggest that it is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
regarding the standard of review on the issue of prejudice. Several cases suggest that it is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
facts in this case are the date of entry of the judgment of eviction and the date on which the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35707 - 2009-03-03
facts in this case are the date of entry of the judgment of eviction and the date on which the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35707 - 2009-03-03
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.[1] See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94047 - 2013-03-10
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.[1] See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94047 - 2013-03-10
CA Blank Order
. The trial court considered the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101834 - 2013-09-08
. The trial court considered the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101834 - 2013-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the Waukesha City Police Department. The circuit court dismissed the case on the ground that the matter had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168683 - 2017-09-21
the Waukesha City Police Department. The circuit court dismissed the case on the ground that the matter had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026288 - 2025-10-22
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026288 - 2025-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id. Whether litigation is procedurally barred presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18
the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id. Whether litigation is procedurally barred presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18