Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4731 - 4740 of 64566 for b's.
Search results 4731 - 4740 of 64566 for b's.
[PDF]
State v. Joel N. Nitka
of conviction for physical abuse of a child, contrary to § 948.03(2)(b) and (5), STATS. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
of conviction for physical abuse of a child, contrary to § 948.03(2)(b) and (5), STATS. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. §§ 302.045(1), 302.045(3m)(b) (2007-08).1 Therefore, on August 16, 2006, the Milwaukee County circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48491 - 2014-09-15
. §§ 302.045(1), 302.045(3m)(b) (2007-08).1 Therefore, on August 16, 2006, the Milwaukee County circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48491 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and disadvantages. WIS. STAT. § 55.14(1)(b). In Melanie L., the court explained the meaning of this statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99952 - 2017-09-21
and disadvantages. WIS. STAT. § 55.14(1)(b). In Melanie L., the court explained the meaning of this statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Travis B. Tarver 02-04-2025 Affirmed and reversed 2023AP001962 CR State v. Demetris
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946323 - 2025-04-21
State v. Travis B. Tarver 02-04-2025 Affirmed and reversed 2023AP001962 CR State v. Demetris
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946323 - 2025-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Wilbert L. Thomas
of the person. (b) If the department of justice does not file a petition under par. (a), the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13530 - 2017-09-21
of the person. (b) If the department of justice does not file a petition under par. (a), the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13530 - 2017-09-21
State v. Buren F. Sprague
., and operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (OMVPAC) in violation of § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13009 - 2005-03-31
., and operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (OMVPAC) in violation of § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13009 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for a Terry stop because Girard was not required to use his left turn signal. See Wis. Stat. § 346.34(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98223 - 2013-09-09
for a Terry stop because Girard was not required to use his left turn signal. See Wis. Stat. § 346.34(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98223 - 2013-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
), 302.045(3m)(b) (2007-08).[1] Therefore, on August 16, 2006, the Milwaukee County circuit court entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48491 - 2010-03-29
), 302.045(3m)(b) (2007-08).[1] Therefore, on August 16, 2006, the Milwaukee County circuit court entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48491 - 2010-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
no other traffic was affected, he was not required to use a signal under Wis. Stat. § 346.34(1)(b), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16
no other traffic was affected, he was not required to use a signal under Wis. Stat. § 346.34(1)(b), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16
State v. Dale Pultz
by Pultz's claims that he was not properly notified. B. Right to Attorney. Next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8199 - 2005-03-31
by Pultz's claims that he was not properly notified. B. Right to Attorney. Next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8199 - 2005-03-31