Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4731 - 4740 of 46921 for show's.
Search results 4731 - 4740 of 46921 for show's.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that the defendant had no prior record, accepted responsibility, showed remorse, was open to treatment, and had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674613 - 2023-07-05
, that the defendant had no prior record, accepted responsibility, showed remorse, was open to treatment, and had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674613 - 2023-07-05
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
Renae Sloan v. Robert Patnode, Jr.
and the court then issued an order to show cause for contempt due to Robert’s failure to make payments to Renae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13831 - 2005-03-31
and the court then issued an order to show cause for contempt due to Robert’s failure to make payments to Renae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13831 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel, a criminal defendant “must show (1) that his or her counsel’s representation was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64335 - 2014-09-15
of counsel, a criminal defendant “must show (1) that his or her counsel’s representation was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64335 - 2014-09-15
William M. Jacoby v. Jo Ellen Jacoby
and shows that the trial court properly considered all of the relevant factors. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4930 - 2005-03-31
and shows that the trial court properly considered all of the relevant factors. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4930 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
showing that the plea was accepted without the trial court’s conformance with Wis. Stat. § 971.08 or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
showing that the plea was accepted without the trial court’s conformance with Wis. Stat. § 971.08 or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in rendering its decision. Regardless, Gorokhovsky fails to show how client surveys expressing some form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347189 - 2021-03-23
in rendering its decision. Regardless, Gorokhovsky fails to show how client surveys expressing some form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347189 - 2021-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the district attorney “never showed any proo[f] or statements made concerning the semi-trailer-tractor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73240 - 2014-09-15
the district attorney “never showed any proo[f] or statements made concerning the semi-trailer-tractor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and intelligently made.” DISCUSSION ¶5 A party challenging a no contest plea “must make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36405 - 2014-09-15
and intelligently made.” DISCUSSION ¶5 A party challenging a no contest plea “must make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36405 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Hakam F. Hamdan
that the trial court acted properly and the burden is on the complainant to “show some unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12408 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court acted properly and the burden is on the complainant to “show some unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12408 - 2017-09-21